« UK productivity: the London effect | Main | Giving the 'Polish plumber' a chance »

Thursday, January 26, 2006

Are China's exports really so special?

Yesterday's post, What's so special about China's exports?, cited a new paper by Dani Rodrik which argued that "China is exporting stuff that is way too sophisticated for its level of income, and that explains part of its success". It's an interesting argument. But is Rodrik right?

A recent paper by Sanjaya Lall (RIP), John Weiss and Jinkang Zhang, entitled The ‘Sophistication’ of Exports: A New Measure of Product Characteristics, suggests that his claims may be exaggerated. This paper proposes:

...a new classification - ‘sophistication’ - as a means of analyzing product characteristics in great detail, based on the average income of exporting economies. Sophistication captures more than technical characteristics; it includes product differentiation, production fragmentation, resource availability and other factors. However, it has the advantage of providing unique continuous scores for each product at any level of detail. We calculate sophistication scores for 237 exports at the 3-digit SITC level and 766 exports at the 4-digit level for 1990 and 2000...

Table 6 in the discussion paper, which ranks country export sophistication, locates China in 2000 with a sophistication index close to those of Chile, Indonesia, Egypt and India.

Figure 2 shows the divergence between actual and predicted sophistication scores in relation to income. Though it shows that China's actual export sophistication is higher than expected from its income levels in both 1990 and 2000, the divergence was not especially big in 1990 - and had halved by 2000. Moreover, many other countries showed a much greater positive divergence in export sophistication. Ireland lead the list in 2000. Also doing better than China were Mexico, the Phillippines, Brazil, Malaysia, Korea, South Africa, Thailand, Costa Rica, Argentina, Taiwan, Germany, the UK and Finland.

If one used purchasing power parity-adjusted per capita income levels the rankings would be somewhat different, but even so, this is hardly a stellar performance.

Note: A shorter version of this paper has just been published as The “sophistication” of exports: A new trade measure in World Development, February 2006.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341caf5253ef00d83425a67053ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Are China's exports really so special?:

» Linklets 31st January from Simon World
China dominates World Economic Forum agenda. Chickens for fighter jets? Shanghaiist reports that Memoirs of a Geisha has officially been banned in China. There are two sides to every story and heres one you probably wont hear in the western ... [Read More]

» China's exports: adding more value from New Economist
China’s higher-end exports are growing rapidly, according to the FT's Richard McGregor in Beijing: The composition of China’s exports has begun to change rapidly, away from reliance on cheap, low-margin goods to more value-added manufactures offering m... [Read More]

» China's export profile: I need to know more from Trade Diversion
China's export profile is a fascinating topic - hence the frequent debate and discussion. The latest contribution is by the FT's Guy de Jonquieres: Now China’s manufacturing miracle is entering a second phase, as producers start to drive aggressively u... [Read More]

Comments

I suspect in Germany's case this is caused by the fact that while those workers that are employed create high value products there are many unemployed, thus lowering the average income level. Ie if somehow those unemployed people vanished Germany's income per capita would be higher (obviously).

Maybe one needs to seperate China into different regions. I suspect the export sophistication is closer to the expected level in the coastal areas (those that actually produce export goods).

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Economist Weblogs

Blogging Stuff

Blog powered by TypePad

Disclaimer


  • This is a personal web site, produced in my own time and solely reflecting my personal opinions. Statements on this site do not represent the views or policies of my employer, past or present, or any other organisation with which I may be affiliated. The information on this site is provided for discussion purposes only, and are not investing recommendations. Under no circumstances does this information represent a recommendation to buy or sell securities.