« Happiness researchers challenge revealed preference theory | Main | UK productivity: the London effect »

Thursday, January 26, 2006

Economic forecasting: the good, the bad, and the ugly

What are the costs of an inaccurate forecast? How can forecasters do better? The latest WSJ Online Econoblog is about The Perils of Forecasting, featuring bloggers  James Hamilton of Econbrowser and Kash Mansori of Angry Bear. They end up more or less on the same page.

Hamilton:

Both for purposes of making forecasts, as well as for basing policy on them, I think our strongest asset is to maintain a fair degree of humility about our ability to predict what's coming next. ...So here's my zen: Don't ask for too much of your forecast or your policy, and it won't disappoint you.

Kash:

..my concluding wish would be the same as yours: that policy makers, be they at the Fed, Congress, the White House, or anywhere else, behave as if the future is extremely uncertain -- which it is. ...A more explicit acknowledgement that even the best forecasts are only very, very rough guesses might help to reduce violations of the "Economic Hippocratic Oath": First, do no harm.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341caf5253ef00d834a6b89969e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Economic forecasting: the good, the bad, and the ugly:

Comments

My very own golden rules of forecasting:

1. Forecasts should be used as part of a process of trying to understand the future – they provide only a partial insight into the economy
2. Any judgements about the future are not facts waiting to happen – there is a chance that they won’t come true
3. Any judgements about the future are based on current information – and this information can be out of date, inaccurate or wrong
4. The forecasts you use should be based on the most accurate (thanks dearieme) and up-to-date information available
5. It is strongly recommended that forecasts do not lead policy response
6. For any forecast it is correct to focus on broad movements and changes rather than on precise numbers
The user should recognise that all projections are subject to error
7. Forecasts cannot predict shocks or sudden events
8. Forecasts should be read with a critical eye – they are usually based on modelling techniques and can overlook the specific uniqueness of local characteristics
9. Finally, forecasts should never be used as the sole input into planning or decision-making

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Economist Weblogs

Blogging Stuff

Blog powered by TypePad

Disclaimer


  • This is a personal web site, produced in my own time and solely reflecting my personal opinions. Statements on this site do not represent the views or policies of my employer, past or present, or any other organisation with which I may be affiliated. The information on this site is provided for discussion purposes only, and are not investing recommendations. Under no circumstances does this information represent a recommendation to buy or sell securities.