The credit crunch: what happened?
While Ken 'worst is yet to come' Rogoff is trying his level best to scare global financial markets about the credit crunch, research is now starting to filter through about just what happened last year. A new IMF working paper by Nathaniel Frank, Brenda González-Hermosillo and Heiko Hesse, Transmission of Liquidity Shocks: Evidence from the 2007 Subprime Crisis, does some of the spadework. As they explain, liquidity crisis soon segued into a solvency crisis (think Northern Rock, Bear Sterns):
It is found that the interaction between market and funding illiquidity increased sharply during the recent period of financial turbulence, and that bank solvency became important. ...What started out as a liquidity crisis, turned into a solvency issue.
It wasn't simply credit that dried up, it was trust - the whole basis of interbank money markets. Banks were unwilling to trust the disclosures or assurances of their counterparties. As a result central banks had to pump hundreds of billions into financial markets to address the liquidity spiral and to ensure the solvency of key financial institutions.
So why did these interactions and correlations spike when the sub-prime crisis hit?
The analysis presented here suggests that increasing financial integration and innovation can make market and funding liquidity pressures readily turn into issues of insolvency.
The easy answer would be to blame the quants and financial engineers. But the real culprit was greed, reinforced by the lousy risk management and lax prudential standards of most major banks (and their clients, many of whom bought products they did not understand). While the money kept rolling in the door, senior managers were quite happy to avert their eyes to the ever-mounting risks.
I was not surprised by the sub-prime crisis; it was an accident waiting to happen. But I didn't expect the credit crunch to have been protracted, particularly once central banks interviened with such gusto.
Rogoff is probably right to say that we are only about half-way through the crisis. But the key issue for me is not whether another major bank goes bust (some of them clearly deserve to). It is whether the risk of US recession is now receding (a U-shaped downturn), or whether we are instead facing a 'W'-shaped downturn, with another growth dip looming. So far my controversial call of no US recession this year has held up, and I still think I am odds on to be proved correct. But the outlook for 2009 has becoming bleaker; there are now too many uncertainties to rule out an eventual recession.






«It wasn't simply credit that dried up, it was trust - the whole basis of interbank money markets. Banks were unwilling to trust the disclosures or assurances of their counterparties. As a result central banks had to pump hundreds of billions into financial markets to address the liquidity spiral and to ensure the solvency of key financial institutions.» That's entirely ridiculous -- usually as in the recent event it is solvency issue that causes illiquidity. Once most banks realized that there were a trillion or two of losses in the banking system, that's when liquidity disappeared, not viceversa. Banks were unwilling to trust their counterparties because they knew most of them had to be insolvent, not just because they suddendly became paranoid. Central banks have put hundreds of billions to address that insolvency, not the liquidity problem, which is just a code-word for not wanting to say "insolvency". The basic problem is not that CDOs are illiquid and one has to hold them to maturity to get cash out of them, but that they are largely worthless and who holds them is insolvent, and once the ponzi scheme stopped because banks had run out of greater fools, they found themselves holding too much of the worthless paper they had created, or even worse, having lent too much money to those who were buying them. Vendor financing is a wonderful way for salesmen to tunnel money our of their companies...
Posted by: Blissex | Sunday, August 24, 2008 at 08:35 PM
Banks are intermediaries with one major job, to evaluate risk and make good loans. It became clear that they were fools, completely unaware (at best) how to run their central business. After proving this, why should they still be in business?
The "Banking Crisis" will only resolve after the managements of these banks are fired, either explicitly or by going out of business.
Posted by: Andrew Garland | Monday, September 01, 2008 at 07:20 PM
I wonder what is supposed to be so new about that analysis? Anyone working in the financial sector was aware of this around this time last year!
Posted by: Eva | Sunday, September 14, 2008 at 09:45 PM
Re: not in a recession
Only if you accept the veracity of the governments numbers. I submit that anyone that accepts and promulgates a recession argument using these politically manipulated figures is naive or corrupt. Either way, it's a statistic that has been engineered to become meaningless. It's the new depression.
Posted by: jim | Saturday, September 20, 2008 at 05:59 AM
Obviously, U.S. government data are correct. For example, if inflation is understated, then so is nominal GDP.
The Panic of 2008
The Bush Administration and the Bernanke Fed recognize the problem. Bad debt locked-up lending to the point where banks wouldn't even lend to each other. The $700 billion injection of cash, in exchange for bad debt, will remove the reason banks are distrustful of lending. It's a brilliant policy, and supports my statements on the causes of this crisis.
The U.S. already captured the real assets and goods, in exchange for employment of export-led economies, and the U.S. government will sell those MBSs in the future when housing prices rise again, which this policy will facilitate. I've stated before, this is an appropriate response to the government policies of export-led economies, and the benefits of this policy will far exceed the costs.
Posted by: Arthur Eckart | Sunday, September 21, 2008 at 02:06 PM
In simple terms, a crisis caused by banks being too nervous to lend money to us or each other. Where they will lend, they charge higher rates of interest to cover their risk. In the real world, that means more expensive mortgages, dearer credit cards, pain for pension savers and other investors as stock markets fluctuate wildly, and in the worst cases repossession and bankruptcy. There is often confusion between the two but they are not the same. A recession is usually taken to mean two successive quarters of negative economic growth. A credit crunch can be separate to or part of a recession. Years of lax lending inflated a huge debt bubble as people borrowed cheap money and ploughed it into property.Lenders were free with their funds, especially in the US, where billions of dollars of so-called Ninja mortgages - no income, no job or assets - were sold to people with weak credit ratings.
---------------------------
francis
Link Building
Posted by: francis | Wednesday, October 01, 2008 at 12:14 AM
Now that government has created the housing bubble it is on to health care!
Posted by: Will Cochran | Wednesday, October 01, 2008 at 06:40 PM
This analysis isn't new, nor that insightful. Anyone with an ounce of economic sense understands that the underlying force of inflating a "bubble" is greed and the deflating element is "fear".
Posted by: Sade Jordan | Friday, December 05, 2008 at 06:47 AM
Nobody ever relates the solvency crisis to when fast food restaurants started accepting credit as a form of payment, but it always turns back to housing. People have to eat too! There were a lot of Whoppers and Taco Grandes being eaten in those McMansions. Heck, that's practically why they're called McMansions!
Posted by: Sam | Saturday, December 13, 2008 at 03:35 AM
EINKAUFS UND Geld
von Raivo Pommer
Der Einkaufsmanager Index der privaten Wirtschaft in der Euro Zone zeigt im Jahre 2009 den schwächsten Wert seit der Index vor 11 Jahren eingeführt wurde. Im Dienstleistung Bereich sieht es ähnlich düster aus und bei den Auslands Aufträgen sieht es besonders übel aus, hier ging es extrem steil nach unten. Viele Export orientierte Betriebe werden sich auf einen Stop ihrer Produktion oder gar Schließungen einstellen müssen.
Im Februar sind bereits die ersten Auswirkungen des Export Einbruchs festzustellen, besonders betroffen sind die Maschinenbauer, diese stellen sich auf Massen Entlassungen ein.
Deutsche Banken haben mehr als 21 Milliarden Dollar in Island versenkt. Die KFW (Kreditanstalt für Wertvernichtung) steht mit 800 Millionen am Pranger. Die Bayern LB soll mit 1,5 Milliarden besonders tief verstrickt sein. Zu den weiteren Wertvernichtern gehören auch die WestLB, Commerzbank, HSH Nordbank und die Deka (Sparkassen Fonds).
Die Commerzbank hat sich mit dem Kauf der Dresdner Bank übernommen und musste dafür den Staat am 9.1.2009 mit ans Ruder lassen, mal sehen wann die nächste Bank einen Rettungsring benötigt.
Spanien hatte mittlerweile eine Arbeitslosenquote von mehr als 16%, im Jahr 2008 gingen 1 Million Arbeitsplätze verloren. Im Januar 2009 beschleunigt sich die Talfahrt, es gehen mehr als 200.000 Arbeitsplätze verloren. Wie wird es in Deutschland am Ende des Jahres 2009 aussehen? Die Schweiz meldet im Februar einen Anstieg der Arbeitslosigkeit auf 3,3%, die Arbeitslosenquote für Ausländer ist doppelt so hoch, die Jugendarbeitslosigkeit wächst um 11% auf 3,9%.
Die Schweizer Großbank UBS meldet am 10.2 einen Jahresverlust für das abgelaufene Jahr von 19,7 Milliarden Franken, arme, reiche Schweiz.
Posted by: Credite | Wednesday, February 11, 2009 at 07:20 PM
VW BANK Krise
von Raivo Pommer
Der oberste Bankenfonds-Kontrolleur beschwert sich, dass die VW-Bank unter den Rettungsschirm darf. Die habe da nichts zu suchen.
Aus den Medien musste Albert Rupprecht (CSU) erfahren, dass jetzt offenbar auch Autobanken unter den Bankenrettungsschirm des Bundes schlüpfen dürfen. Man darf sagen: Einverstanden ist der Vorsitzende des parlamentarischen Kontrollgremiums für den 480 Milliarden Euro schweren Rettungsfonds Soffin damit nicht.
Die VW-Bank soll offenbar staatliche Garantien im Gegenwert von zwei Milliarden Euro erhalten. "Das war so nicht abgemacht", beklagt sich Rupprecht in einem Schreiben an Soffin-Chef Hannes Rehm und den Vorsitzenden des entscheidenden Lenkungsausschusses der Bundesregierung, Finanz-Staatssekretär Jörg Asmussen.
Posted by: VW | Friday, February 20, 2009 at 12:02 PM
US-Bankensektor:
von Raivo Pommer-Eesti-raimo1@hot.ee
Die Finanzkrise treibt die einst weltgrößte Bank Citigroup in die Arme des Staates. Angesichts neuer überraschender Milliardenlöcher wird der taumelnde Finanzriese teilverstaatlicht. Die US-Regierung weitet ihren Anteil als künftig größter Aktionär auf bis zu 36 Prozent aus.
Die Märkte reagierten am Freitag auf den historischen Schritt in der US-Bankenbranche mit Entsetzen: Die Citi-Aktie stürzte fast ins Bodenlose und riss die Märkte weltweit mit. Der Eingriff des Staates heizte die Spekulationen weiter an, welches US-Institut als nächstes womöglich sogar komplett von der Regierung übernommen werden könnte.
Die Krise der Citigroup beschleunigte sich nochmals dramatisch: Für 2008 gab sie am Freitag überraschend neue Wertberichtigungen von 9,6 Milliarden Dollar (7,5 Mrd Euro) vor Steuern bekannt. Damit liegt der Rekordverlust für das vergangene Jahr mit nun 27,7 Milliarden Dollar noch einmal um knapp die Hälfte höher als kürzlich verkündet. Schon bisher zählte die Bank zu den weltweit größten Verlierern der Finanzkrise.
Posted by: record lust | Friday, February 27, 2009 at 07:27 PM
Yes, I think your blog is not only informative and useful but refreshing as well.Thanks and keep going.
Posted by: hypotheek meeverhuizen | Thursday, March 19, 2009 at 04:25 AM
It wasn't simply credit that dried up, it was trust - the whole basis of interbank money markets. Banks were unwilling to trust the disclosures or assurances of their counterparties. As a result central banks had to pump hundreds of billions into financial markets to address the liquidity spiral and to ensure the solvency of key financial institutions.estetik rent a car arac kiralama sac ekimi estetik istanbul oto kiralama yazgulu diyet araba kiralama herbalife chat burun estetigi
Posted by: estetik | Monday, April 06, 2009 at 05:57 PM
estetik rent a car arac kiralama sac ekimi estetik istanbul oto kiralama yazgulu diyet araba kiralama herbalife chat burun estetigi
burun estetigi
Smartlipo lazerlipoliz
yuz estetigi
hosting
evden eve nakliyat
Posted by: estetik | Friday, April 10, 2009 at 12:40 PM
I have been araç kiralama watching a long-time work. You are really good things take place to oto kiralama contribute your blog I'll do my best work comes from.
Posted by: oto kiralama | Tuesday, April 28, 2009 at 09:08 AM
wholesale jewelry,handmade jewelry,costume jewelry,jewelry wholesale,fashion jewelry,wholesale fashion jewelry,wholesale costume jewelry ,wholesale pearl,wholesale crystal,discount jewelry,
Posted by: fashion jewelry | Tuesday, April 28, 2009 at 10:50 AM
web tasarımı
burun estetigi
yazgulu
yazgulu
Posted by: web tasarımı | Wednesday, April 29, 2009 at 11:27 PM
The U.S. already captured the real assets and goods, in exchange for employment of export-led economies, and the U.S. government will sell those MBSs in the future when housing prices rise again, which this policy will facilitate.www.interrentacar.com.tr
Posted by: interrentacar | Sunday, May 10, 2009 at 01:50 PM
çet
sohbet
chat sitesi
sohbet istanbul
Posted by: çet | Monday, May 11, 2009 at 01:28 PM
Nice blog design. This seems like it would be a very interesting blog to keep up with. Please come visit my site mortgages when you got time.
Posted by: Mortgage Rates | Saturday, May 30, 2009 at 02:41 PM
Really it is nice post and thanks for sharing it and really it is very useful. Please come visit my site home inspector and give me any valuable feedbacks.
Posted by: Property Inspectors | Saturday, May 30, 2009 at 02:43 PM
fads
Posted by: afds | Tuesday, June 02, 2009 at 08:08 AM
Chat Odaları
Muhabbet Odaları
Muhabbet Odaları
Sohbet Odaları
Posted by: Chat Odaları | Wednesday, June 10, 2009 at 10:26 AM
..Your site is very easy in terms of expression and open. I think everyone who enters your site is very gratifying, but also sharing a very nice opportunity to give ...
Posted by: neon | Sunday, June 14, 2009 at 09:47 PM