« Asian blogs 1: Simon World | Main | How I learned to love economics »

Friday, August 19, 2005



More details about the FOI angle of this story are here.


"It would be quite difficult to design a revenue-neutral flat tax that didn't reduce the income tax paid by high-income earners. If the tax scales also ensured low-income earners were no worse off, then middle-income taxpayers would be the losers."

But a flat-tax doesn't have tax scales, New Economist. "Flat" means they all pay the same rate.

Please explain further.

New Economist


What I mean is that - provided one wishes to maintain revenue neutrality, an important proviso - it would be extremely difficult for the UK government to move from their current progressive income tax scales to a flat personal income tax rate without the rich ending up paying less and the middle class paying more income tax. As I say above, "middle-income taxpayers would be the losers".

I again challenge anyone to come up with a set of tax scales that can achieve this; I doubt anyone can.

The situation of lower income taxpayers is different. If a sufficiently generous tax-free threshold is introduced alongside the flat tax rate, then some working poor could end up better off than now. But again, if revenue neutral is to be maintained then someone has to pay for it - and it certainly won't be the rich. It would be the middle class.

A flat tax rate would be political suicide in most Western democracies, provided the income of the median voter is not too far from the income of the median household (the US is one possible exception here). That is why even Britain's Tory party have just rejected such proposals. See my latest post: Tories reject flat tax

Of course many flat tax advocates believe in smaller government and want to slash public spending. That could conceivably pay for the tax cuts they promise, though it would also mean worse public services. Unfortunately, flat taxers are often quite covert (if not downright deceitful) about this agenda, pretending that simpler tax scales would somewhow unleash hundreds of billions of pounds in to the Exchequer's coffers. It wouldn't. That is a libertarian fantasy.

nike air max


The eye catching Electric Green is used on the nike air max

2009 and the surrounding of the Air Max unit. The midsole and shoe laces both feature white. This Nike Air Max is a Hybrid, which we can see a lot more of from

Nike. This Air Max 90 looks like a sneaker that a superhero

would wear. But these are for everyone, not only the superheroes.

This latest Air Max 360 Current Moire comes in an eye popping.

Black is seen throughout the shoe including the upper. Blue is placed on the inner of the sneaker. nike air max shoes If you are into bright colors when it comes to sneakers, better check the new colorways from

href="http://shop.brandsuper.com/nike-air-max-shoes-nike-air-max-ltd-shoes-c-54_74.html">nike air max LTD. In quality soft suede combined with mesh

material, these new shoes would be another hit in the market.

The comments to this entry are closed.


  • TEST

  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Economist Weblogs



  • This is a personal web site, produced in my own time and solely reflecting my personal opinions. Statements on this site do not represent the views or policies of my employer, past or present, or any other organisation with which I may be affiliated. The information on this site is provided for discussion purposes only, and are not investing recommendations. Under no circumstances does this information represent a recommendation to buy or sell securities.