« China wants less inequality, more 'social fairness and democracy' | Main | India's yawning contradiction »

Monday, October 03, 2005

Comments

Ironman

Just a heads-uy - Zimran at Winterspeak has a first-hand account from a PhD candidate who attended Barro's lecture there on the topic.

zoe

Has anyone checked out Mandelbrot's opinion, founder of fractal geometry? In his book, "The (Mis)Behavior of Market" (2004), he argues (quite convincingly) that the use of Gaussian distribution (normal distribution) in CAPM is not justified. Historical prices rarely if ever converge to a mean; therefore, orthodox calculations of risk and return have been inaccurate. Using Guassian estimations, a catastrophic event would occur once every hundred years (ie drastic price declines fall several deviations from the mean) but, in fact, empirical data shows that the frequency of such "improbable" losses is far greater than predicted. Goeztmann confirms Mandelbrot's assesment via cross country analysis showing that, of 39 countries (mostly developed), only one or arguably two have not experienced a permanent break in the market. "The U.S is the exception, not the rule." Mandelbrot suggests a more accurate probablity distribution.... using fractals. (I will do my best to describe this momentarily)

Aşk mektupları

Thank you for this wonderful article ... really very nice - there are such things
şiir
güzel sözler
Fena sözler

The comments to this entry are closed.

Information




  • TEST


  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Economist Weblogs

Disclaimer


  • This is a personal web site, produced in my own time and solely reflecting my personal opinions. Statements on this site do not represent the views or policies of my employer, past or present, or any other organisation with which I may be affiliated. The information on this site is provided for discussion purposes only, and are not investing recommendations. Under no circumstances does this information represent a recommendation to buy or sell securities.