« Bah humbug! | Main | Evidence-based policy: cult or necessity? »

Saturday, December 03, 2005

Comments

Hardwin Jones

How have you read that he said "a 12-fold increase in trade has helped boost living standards" (which you say he says is a bad thing, which is an asinine comment)?
I think he's pointing up that the five-fold increase in economic growth has *not* led to an increase in living standards.
Amazing heresy as it may seem to an economist, the evidence even just within the paragraph you cite is that economic growth does not of necessity equate to growth in standard of living - there are significant factors which can weaken that linkage - including for one thing the policies pushed by the World Bank.

New Economist

Hardwin, a five-fold increase in growth will indeed improve living standards. You would be hard pressed to come up with a plausible economic system - even one run by a corrupt dictator - where such a huge increase in output did not lead to some improvement in living standards.

True, billions of people still live in absolute poverty, and we should not be complacent about that. But it is also true that the proportion is lower than two or three decades ago. Don't believe me - look at the work of the World Bank and its critics. A 2001 paper by Chen and Ravallion at the World Bank argued there had been a significant reduction in global poverty. They were criticised by some for over-estimating the reduction, and by others for under-estimating it. But you would find it difficult to find someone who can credibly claim there has been NO reduction. For a useful summary see: The Global Poverty Numbers Debate


Hardwin Jones

Hi, well I'm not sure what the five-fold increase is that Goldsmith's talking about.
But if we take the global economy, which Goldsmith seems to be referring to, it's growing in value, but both the number and proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans in extreme poverty is increasing (the lessening of world poverty you refer to is a result of South Asia's success in gradually climbing out of poverty)*.
This seems to indicate that you *can* have economic growth with no consequent increase in living standards for large sections of the population, indeed entire regions of the globe - which are nevertheless integrated into world trade, and are exporting large amounts of food and minerals.
The reason isn't (or isn't solely or mostly) corrupt dictators, but is more often down to various structural aspects of the current paradigm of globalisation, which Goldsmith alludes to. For one thing, the conditionalities imposed by the World Bank and the IMF are designed to allow the wealth of developing nations to flow unimpeded to rich country investors (Stiglitz).
If you'd like a reference for this, I'll find it at home and send it!

Tapsearch Com Tapart News

Explore the upside down Flat World of Thomas Friedman, a leading evangelist for Globalization and Free Trade. He says there were turning points in history that open the way for Globalization which he calls flatteners. However, he makes history fables in his analysis with not much matching up with the real world. It is garbage in and garbage out. He uses current statistics comparing the past but these stats do not compute with the past. He ignores the fact that workers have no voice in the process of Globalization and Free Trade. He uses "communication of rank" in an elitist fashion of the New York Times where he is a columnist. Instead of reading his book, we should be preparing for the post-globalization era. History tells us what happens when workers dignity is defaced and degraded.
See also http://tapsearch.com/tapartnews
http://www.experiencedesignernetwork.com/archives/000636.html
http://arklineart.fotopages.com about the Art that Talks by Ray Tapajna

nike air max

xyy

The eye catching Electric Green is used on the nike air max

2009 and the surrounding of the Air Max unit. The midsole and shoe laces both feature white. This Nike Air Max is a Hybrid, which we can see a lot more of from

Nike. This Air Max 90 looks like a sneaker that a superhero

would wear. But these are for everyone, not only the superheroes.


This latest Air Max 360 Current Moire comes in an eye popping.

Black is seen throughout the shoe including the upper. Blue is placed on the inner of the sneaker. nike air max shoes If you are into bright colors when it comes to sneakers, better check the new colorways from

href="http://shop.brandsuper.com/nike-air-max-shoes-nike-air-max-ltd-shoes-c-54_74.html">nike air max LTD. In quality soft suede combined with mesh

material, these new shoes would be another hit in the market.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Information




  • TEST


  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Economist Weblogs

Categories

Disclaimer


  • This is a personal web site, produced in my own time and solely reflecting my personal opinions. Statements on this site do not represent the views or policies of my employer, past or present, or any other organisation with which I may be affiliated. The information on this site is provided for discussion purposes only, and are not investing recommendations. Under no circumstances does this information represent a recommendation to buy or sell securities.