Some European politicians are turning to the Danish 'flexicurity model' - a combination of easy hiring and firing, generous unemployment benefits and an active labour market policy - in an attempt to reinvigorate their sluggish labour market. This week French PM Dominique de Villepin, for example, announced measures to boost youth employment that seem to have been inspired by the 'flexicurity' model.
But if it's such a great system, why haven't other European countries adopted it already? After all, the model has been around for over a decade and has been actively touted by the European Commission. Two French labour economists, Yann Algan and Pierre Cahuc, attempt to explain this puzzle. In a new IZA discussion paper, Civic attitudes and the design of labor market institutions: Which countries can implement the Danish flexicurity model?, they argue that the generous unemployment benefits that form part of the Danish model can only work in a high-trust society where few cheat the system:
We argue that the flexicurity model is hardly sustainable in countries displaying weak public-spiritedness because the unemployment insurance design raises moral hazard issues that are much more difficult to overcome in countries where individuals are more prone to cheat over government benefits.
Besides, we are also able to document that civic attitudes cannot be systematically changed quickly just by changing institutions. This result has far-reaching consequences for the policy reforms agenda. It indicates that civic attitudes impose real constraints on the choice of labor market institutions. From this point of view, it is unlikely that countries with weak public-spiritedness can implement the Danish Model without specific action aimed at changing the values of their citizens.
...this analysis suggests that public-spiritedness is a key ingredient in the possibility for a society to implement efficient public unemployment insurance. To that regard, a country may be unlikely to succeed in its labor market reforms without a comprehensive policy affecting civic behavior of its citizens.
France is not such a country. The authors demonstrate that it has a much less generous unemployment benefit system than the Danes, and the French are much more accepting towards welfare cheating. On that evidence no sane French politician would want to import the flexicurity model. The authors conclude:
...this analysis suggests that public-spiritedness is a key ingredient in the possibility for a society to implement efficient public unemployment insurance. To that regard, a country may be unlikely to succeed in its labor market reforms without a comprehensive policy affecting civic behavior of its citizens.
This is an interesting proposition. While it doesn't wholly resolve the policy question, it takes us some of the way there. It also helps answer the vexed debate over whether the Nordic model is exportable.
During the recent spell on the Nordic model here at NewEconomist I responded over at my own blog http://clausvistesen.squarespace.com/alphasources-blog/2005/12/8/looking-to-the-north-for-a-remedy.html
I more or less agree with the basic principle of the points above; i.e. the model cannot be easily exported because of societal differences. I don't know yet whether I will go for the "public spiritedness" argument though. However, the quote below from my blog still sums up my views on this matter.
"France cannot rely on some Nordic model to come to the rescue bringing prosperity and wealth. And even if cherry picking the economic virtues of the Scandinavian countries would indeed be a solution, France has some issues to deal with which cannot be remedied by the cross-national transfer of economic ideas."
Posted by: Claus Vistesen | Thursday, January 19, 2006 at 08:42 AM
Yes, Claus, and there is also the 'insider' 'outsider' issue I mentioned in the French labour market context yesterday.
New Economist had a relevant post here:
http://neweconomist.blogs.com/new_economist/2005/09/denmark_doesnt_.html
From the Migration Policy Group European Civic Citizenship and Inclusion Index 2004;
New Economist:
More of a surprise were the laggards. Greece and Luxembourg did badly, but worst was Denmark - it was well below-average in all five policy strands. Third Country Nationals account for 5% of the Danish population. Their unemployment rate is more than three times as high as Danish nationals, and the gap has widened since 2002.
The report itself comments:
"The 1992 Danish opt-out in the sector of Justice and Home Affairs – coupled with an opt-out on European citizenship – affects commentary on migration and inclusion issues considerably. While the Danish Presidency of the EU made a positive reference to the economic and social inclusion of TCNs in 2002, this remains an extremely sensitive area in domestic political debate."
Don't you have really strict marriage laws, and a not very friendly attitude to Polish and other new EU member workers?
Actually, I must go and have another look at My Life As A Dog.
Meanwhile, a post on your blog about Denamark, and the limitations would be really interesting, Claus.
Posted by: Edward Hugh | Thursday, January 19, 2006 at 08:57 AM
"Don't you have really strict marriage laws, and a not very friendly attitude to Polish and other new EU member workers?"
Ohh yes ...
Actually the Danish government had to amend the "marriage with foreigner" law today because of increasing pressure from Human right watchers. Personally I support the sitting government but their attitudes and tone towards especially the muslim minorities are not something to be proud of.
Concerning Polish plumbers I don't think our attitudes are any worse than other places. Like in other countries it is the unions who, rightly or not, see cheap labour from Eastern Europe undercutting their work and living conditions.
"Meanwhile, a post on your blog about Denamark, and the limitations would be really interesting, Claus."
What limitations? Limitations of the flexicurity model? Well, the Danish economy is steaming ahead in the moment so I do not know whether I could argue that the flexicurity model is doing Denmark bad other than the fact that it is very expensive ...
However, if there is one group of countries who will potentially suffer from the classical demographic notion of "fewer young people to subsidize more old people" it is the Scandinavian countries and most notably Denmark and Sweden because their welfare systems are very expensive ... Normay is home-free because of oil reserves :).
Posted by: Claus Vistesen | Thursday, January 19, 2006 at 10:04 AM
"What limitations? Limitations of the flexicurity model?"
Yep, I think nothing can be 100% good. There must be downside aspects somewhere. I think it is important to look at everything.
Let's be clear, I think the idea behind your system is excellent, changing jobs frequently and re-training in-between (at least this is how I understand it).
But then I don't understand this:
"Their unemployment rate is more than three times as high as Danish nationals, and the gap has widened since 2002."
The system should be working for these people too.
"Concerning Polish plumbers I don't think our attitudes are any worse than other places."
Well they do seem to be worse than in the UK and Sweden, for eg.
"At the moment, only the UK, Ireland and Sweden have fully opened their labour markets to workers from the post-communist countries that joined the EU in May 2004".
http://euobserver.com/9/20684
Also the system seems to rely closely on Trade Union support and participation (which you note in your quote from Le Monde in your piece on Denmark and France). This does lead to downside situations like these:
http://more.fistfulofeuros.net/archives/001942.php
What follows comes from (the Danish-run) EU Observer
"Danish trade unions have accused the Polish embassy in Copenhagen of encouraging Polish construction workers to ignore the collective agreements that regulate the Danish labour market...."
"They argue that the Danish labour model is being undermined but their opponents believe that the Danish trade union model itself undermines the EU principle of freedom of movement."
"The Polish embassy website had informed Polish workers interested in coming to Denmark that they should comply with regional and national agreements on salaries and working conditions, but also points out they are not under legal obligation to do so."
"This would mean that Polish workers could technically work for under the agreed minimum wage - making them more attractive than Danish workers."
Posted by: Edward Hugh | Thursday, January 19, 2006 at 04:35 PM
While I am sure that values count for something, the main problem with the "values" premise in Algan & Cahuc's paper is that it simply ignores the facts:
1. the current Danish system has considerable enforcement mechanisms in place to stop cheating and encourage "reactivation".
2. Before "flexicurity" (i.e., prior to the early 1990s) Denmark had virtually unlimited unemployment benefits and comparatively little in place to activate people. From 1980-1993 its average unemployment rate was around 8.5% (it was 9.5% in France). (Note that this contrasts with Sweden where "activation" type labor market programs are more long-established)
3. After "flexicurity" was implemented (circa 1993) the regime shifted to were greater time restrictions on benefits, more stringent conditions to receive benefits. For most people with wages greater than say 80% of the average full time wage, benefit levels were cut considerably. (The nominal rate of wage replacement remained high, but the maximum benefit level lagged full time wages, with the effect that a wage earners effective replacement rate as a portion of his/her work income is considerably lower now than 10 years ago). Given all of this, and the differences from past practice, it is perhaps not surprising that Danish unemployment came down considerably, and is now 5% or so.
Thus, one hardly needs to appeal to Danish virtue to explain its change in unemployment. Presumably Danes were no less virtuous in the 1980s than they were in the 1990s; and if the opinion polls are to be believed, they were not.
If one really believed that Nordic values were driving this, one would be hard pressed to explain why the Finns found it so necessary to crack down on unemployment benefits for so long after 1989, and why the Swedes reined in its UE benefit generosity when the state gave up on full employment in the early 1990s. Presumably such changes would not have been necessary to get Nordic people to work more.
What the French and many other Continental Europeans also have that the Danes don't is much more legal job protection. The lack of job security is the "flex" part of flexicurity. (Denmark has comparatively low rates of job tenure.)
So the question of whether the model is exportable hinges a lot more on whether you plan to export the whole thing, the "flex" part or the "security" part. It seems like much of the sympathy for the Danish "model" is that its reduction in unemployment did not massively increase income inequality, something definitely NOT true in other countries that reduced or maintained low unemployment (i.e., UK or US). Different people (and you can probably predict their economic positions) tend to advocate just one of the "partial" solutions-- more "flexibility" or more "security"-- without biting the other side of the apple.
As an aside (I do not recall if it is in their paper), it seems that a "cultural" view would perhaps look for culturally similar cases for France to emulate. Spain, anyone?
Posted by: Lyle Scruggs | Sunday, January 22, 2006 at 01:16 AM
A decade ago, the Danish umemployment rate was equal to that of present day France and Germany. What has changed? Flexibility, security or both? Neither, actually.
Two things are worth noting.
First, generosity of benefits have drastically decreased for young unemployed, leading to a similar drastic reduction in youth unemployment.
Second, while unemployment benefits to older unemployed have grown at a lower rate than wages, they are still quite generous. However, "active labour market policies" have been implementet that require the unemployed to be "activated" and work effectively as a tax on the unemployed. Not an income tax, though, but a tax on time and utility.
Posted by: old Danish economist | Sunday, January 22, 2006 at 03:32 PM
Posted by: Fahri KUMRU | Sunday, September 16, 2007 at 10:06 PM
Here is another interesting article on flexicurity - discusses some potential negative impacts
http://www.mindreign.com/en/mindshare/Global-Economics/Flexicurity-and-European-Unemployment/sl35291137bp292cpp10pn1.html
Posted by: Jim Tressor | Wednesday, June 24, 2009 at 07:08 PM
Thank you, it's very amazing information about this good topic it might be very helpful for students.
Recently i needed resume writer. To my adroitest surprise, resume was deserving the price I paid for it.
Posted by: ODRY29 | Saturday, January 09, 2010 at 05:42 AM
Very good posting. I just love it.
Good work. :)
http://webroyalty.com
Posted by: Nick Matyas | Saturday, January 09, 2010 at 05:22 PM
Very interesting. I'm surprised your longer but excellent article was not published in the US version.
I tend to believe that people vote with their feet when there are places they deem to be better than where they are. Hence many of the world's peoples try to get into the US, legally, or if that is not possible, illegally. That speaks well for the US. But as we all know, people coming to the US may be doing so because of a dream, which may not have been a good measure of what they found once they got here.
Posted by: r4 | Wednesday, February 10, 2010 at 11:48 AM
istanbul hotel israel graund hotel hotelles artic thanks This article is very beautiful, I really get very beyendım text files manually to your health as you travesti very beautiful and I wish you continued success with all respect ..
Thanks for helpful information travesti siteleri you catch up us with your sagol instructional çok explanation.
en iyi travestiler en guzel travesti
travesti
travesti forum
istanbul travestileri
ankara travestileri
izmir travestileri
bursa travestileri
travestiler
trv
travesti siteleri
travesti video
travesti
travesti
travesti
travestiler
travesti
travestiler
sohbet
travesti
chat
organik
güncel blog
sohbet
turkce mirc
Posted by: travesti | Wednesday, June 09, 2010 at 01:40 PM
What Limitations ?? And Why Limitation ??
Posted by: Mesothelioma | Thursday, July 15, 2010 at 12:09 PM
It’s really great to see such a informative post where the information could be shared with my friends thanks for post.
Posted by: Mortgage Refinance | Thursday, July 22, 2010 at 10:49 AM
Thank you for this wonderful article ... really very nice - there are such things
amatör şairler
Esrarlı sözler
güzel sözler
Posted by: aşk sözleri | Friday, August 13, 2010 at 01:35 AM
Valuable information you got here! I would like to thank you for sharing your thoughts and time into the stuff you post!! Thumbs up
Posted by: Writing Services | Wednesday, August 18, 2010 at 10:00 AM
Stock market India is volatile and all those who speculate in market are loosing everyday. Please remember stock market is not for speculation purpose. If one feel investing in stock market is gamble then its better to think again.
One should always note that if they want to invest money they should do proper research be it fundamental research or technical research. Just think how come you can invest
your money without any convincing reason for the same?
Indian stock market is one of the most happening and emerging market. Major Indian stock exchanges are BSE and NSE and both are of world class standards.
So grab good stocks and invest that’s the bottom line.
We hope to see you in major profits.
Commodity Tips
Posted by: Intraday Tips | Monday, October 18, 2010 at 06:56 AM
Great leaders to play to the advantages of each team, so that high value. As a humble, warm, friendly and attention --- we are a great way to start building such a place. I am fully immersed in this range, we thank you very much for sharing with us your wonderful blog. Best regards!
Posted by: air yeezy | Tuesday, November 02, 2010 at 02:19 AM
We must accept finite disappointment, but we must never lose infinite hope.
Posted by: Air Jordan shoes | Wednesday, November 03, 2010 at 12:51 AM
In my opinion it is a good program that can be well apply for countries that use to work under the third word conditions because I think that employee is the ones that need to have more benefits in their job.
Posted by: Kamagra | Thursday, November 11, 2010 at 02:05 PM
I am so proud that so great creators are in our world. In case I were the queen of the monarchy, I would grant the creator of this essay with medal
Posted by: genital herpes | Tuesday, November 30, 2010 at 03:58 PM
Indian stock market is one of the most happening and emerging market. Major Indian stock exchanges are BSE and NSE and both are of world class standards.
So grab good stocks and invest that’s the bottom line.
We hope to see you in major profits
Posted by: erotic shop | Saturday, December 18, 2010 at 03:18 PM
We have to remember thatmust of european countries have a high rate of immigrants that makes impossible for goverment to realize how liable society is. Goverment doesn't trust is people anymore...
Posted by: Internet Services Providers | Sunday, February 06, 2011 at 09:26 PM
Çilek sex shop Mağzamızda En Kaliteli sex ürünleri, sex oyuncakları şişme bebek ve erotic shop erotik giyim Ürünlerini Bulabileceğiniz Gibi Ayrıca, penis büyütücü, geciktirici, Bayan Uyarıcı, Ürünlerde Temin Edebilirsiniz. 1994 ten Bu Yana En Kaliteli Orjinal Erotik Ürünlerini Sağlamakta Olan Çilek Erotik Shop ta Tüm Cinsel Ürünleri Bulabilirsiniz
Posted by: Maria | Tuesday, February 15, 2011 at 10:59 AM
That's the reason youth is protesting against goverment because of this 'flexicurity model'..
Posted by: Florida Certified Public Accountants | Saturday, February 19, 2011 at 03:44 PM
Nakliye Firmaları Olarak Bu Projeyi Desteklemeyiz. Web Tasarım Konusunda Yardımları Dokunan Çengelli İnternet Hizmetleri ne Ayrıca Teşekkür Ediyoruz. Bilgi Kaynağı ve Webmaster Portalı Olan Windows Belediyesi ise Gerçekten Çok Başarılı Bir Site
Posted by: Çengelli | Monday, March 14, 2011 at 12:43 PM
Besides, we are also able to document that civic attitudes cannot be systematically changed quickly just by changing institutions.
Posted by: Account Deleted | Friday, April 22, 2011 at 10:25 AM
I would like to thank you for the efforts you've made in writing this posting. I'm hoping the same very best function from you inside future too.
Posted by: Study Agent | Monday, May 02, 2011 at 09:00 AM
I love your blog! You will be in our prayers and thoughts! Nice and informative post on this topic thanks for sharing with us.Thank you
Posted by: Web Design | Tuesday, June 21, 2011 at 07:23 AM