Europe's Gazprom problem

I don't often write about energy matters, but it seems that Europe has a looming Gazprom problem. The largest natural gas extractor in the world, and third largest oil company, Gazprom appears keen to dominate European energy markets.

It is a huge company, overtaking Microsoft to become the world's third largest company by market value. But this is no ordinary goliath - the Russian government has a majority on the board of directors. Gazprom has already flexed its muscles by cutting off gas to the Ukraine, and warning Belarus it will triple gas prices by year-end. Now it has turned its attention to the European Union.

A feature article by Richard Orange in The Business, on the recent Russian Economic Forum in London is a warning of things to come: Don't stand in the way.

The Russian bear was growling and Moscow was demonstrating its growing economic influence on the West. Alexander Medvedev, gas giant Gazprom’s deputy chief executive, even made it on to the BBC’s main evening news signifying just how far Russian companies have come in establishing their global profile.

President Vladimir Putin’s seizure of control over Russia’s oil and gas sector is now complete. Russia is flexing its muscles to recover its former superpower’s swagger on the world stage.

The forum’s week came after a threat from Alexei Miller, chief executive of Gazprom: if Europe didn’t allow it the access it wants to European gas pipeline and supply companies, Gazprom might divert its European energy supplies to the US and the Far East. On the BBC, Medvedev put it even more clearly: “There are two concepts available – a weak Russia or a strong Russia. There are still people who believe that weak Russia is good for the world. We completely disagree with this. A strong Gazprom is good for the world.”

Cliff Kupchan at Eurasia Group, a consultancy that studies the politics of energy told The Business: “In the 20 years I’ve been doing this, I’ve never seen Gazprom exert this extent of bullying or political pressure. I could describe the Moscow mindset right now as ‘Petro-steroid’. They think this is their ticket back to the world stage … and they may be right.”

...Gazprom’s Miller made his threat after meeting 12 European ambassadors in Moscow. What other company can call in that kind of audience at short notice? When was the last time a listed company tried to dictate energy policy to a union of 15 of the world’s most powerful countries?

Mattias Westman, chief executive of Prosperity Capital, a leading Moscow-based investment fund told The Business: “There’s never been a company with Gazprom’s type of power. Not since the days of Standard Oil anyway and that was a long time ago.”

The United Kingdom has taken Gazprom’s bullying as a warning not to block any bid it might make for UK energy retailer Centrica. Gazprom has made clear it will not respond well if its efforts to control the European gas market right down to supplying directly to consumers are frustrated. UK Prime Minister Tony Blair quickly capitulated saying his government would not stand in the way should Gazprom bid for Centrica.

Gazprom’s executives are flexing their muscles because they are angry with the European Union’s policy of energy liberalisation, which the European Commission has this year belatedly begun to force on to some of Gazpom’s key customers, such as Germany’s Eon, France’s GdF, and Italy’s Eni.

When Medvedev says Gazprom aims to take a share of Europe’s downstream gas pipelines in the same breath as he writes off the Energy Charter Russia signed with Europe, as a “stillborn document”, it is intended as a deliberate snub to Commission president José Manuel Barroso. The commission’s boss travelled to Moscow in February to try to broker an exchange whereby Gazprom would allow European companies access to its gas fields and pipelines, a key part of the Energy Charter, and Europe would offer its downstream. Gazprom wants its side of the deal without offering anything in return.

Last September The Business reported that Gazprom aimed to triple its market value within three to five years to the point where it would rival Exxon Mobil’s $380bn value. That already seems ridiculously timid. Morgan Stanley, in a note this month, said Gazprom’s true value was already between $350bn to $450bn. Its share price has already more than quadrupled in the last year. Just as the forum ended last week, Gazprom’s market cap overtook Britain’s largest company, BP, hitting a value of $264bn. By the end of the week, it had overtaken Microsoft.

During the forum, Medvedev said Gazprom’s value could rise to $1 trillion in the next 10 years, making Gazprom the largest company on the world’s stock markets. Even at that market value, Gazprom’s mammoth gas reserves, between a quarter and a third of the world’s total, would still be valued at less than half those of Royal Dutch Shell’s.

Putin’s achievement with Gazprom was to wrest control back over the vast monopoly and put his own men, Miller and Gazprom chairman and Kremlin chief of staff Dmitri Medvedev, at the helm.

...In the short term, Europe need not worry about its gas supplies being diverted to North America or the Far East. Gazprom’s vast Shtokman development in the Arctic Sea will start to deliver gas to the US from 2015 at the earliest, and plans for two pipelines that could eventually supply China with 60bn to 80bn cubic metres a year are at an early stage.

Until these come to fruition, Gazprom is as reliant on Europe as Europe is on Gazprom. Russia supplies 26% of Europe’s gas, but just 2% of the UK’s gas requirement and relies on its western European exports to make its books add up. It gains around $40 for each barrel’s worth of gas it sells in Europe, and just $7 in its heavily subsidised home market. So it shouldn’t surprise that it aims to increase supplies to the EU by 33%, and to the UK to 20%.

...Alexander Medvedev des­cribed the reaction of the UK press to rumours of a Centrica takeover as hysterical. But Gazprom only has ambitions to control the gas market closer to consumers because it fears Europe might look elsewhere for supplies, and that there might be a crash in gas prices. Gazprom’s heavy-handed threats risk being counter-productive. Every time it spooks Western governments it brings a revival of the nuclear industry, clean coal and renewable energy one step closer. Gazprom’s opposition to European market liberalisation also comes from its weaknesses. EU energy liberalisation threatens Gazprom’s ability to make investments in its Siberian heartland which it desperately needs to keep its supplies coming.

A London banker told The Business: “They want big, monopolistic companies with lots of assets that can be their counterparty, because they’ve got a weak credit rating and the only way they can raise money is against gas offtake agreements with counterparties, if they want to fund this massive investment programme.”

The people benefiting most from the emergence of Russia’s oil and gas giants are international investors who were this year allowed to invest freely in Gazprom for the first time, and will soon be able to invest in Rosneft. Bill Browder, chief executive of Hermitage Capital, a long time investor in Gazprom, said: “As shareholders we are delighted for it to have such ambitious targets. Five years ago it was difficult to find anyone in Gazprom who even knew what the market cap was.”

...Who knows what delights the Forum organisers are lining up for next year’s party. But you can be certain Rosneft and Gazprom have secured their places at the world’s top table.

   

Comments

[acekards]

Im not so upbeat on shale gas. It takes alot of water to crack the shale and get a ramp up in gas production ... no telling how long the increased supply will last as this is NEW 'technology.' Why do I question this? For the same reason that pumping nitrogen into the Mexican Canterall fields didn't help increase production FOR VERY LONG. Besides having the potential to seriously undermine the quality of drinking water ... increased methane (gas) production is not what the world needs as methane powered vehicles don't go very far ... AS COMPARED TO GASOLINE POWERED VEHICLES ... on a compressed tank of natural gas.

[travesti]

istanbul hotel Canada hotelles artic thanks This article is very beautiful, I really get very beyendım text files manually to your health as you travesti very beautiful and I wish you continued success with all respect ..

Thanks for helpful information travesti siteleri you catch up us with your sagol instructional çok explanation.
en iyi travestiler en guzel travesti

travesti
travesti forum
istanbul travestileri
ankara travestileri
izmir travestileri
bursa travestileri
travestiler
trv
travesti siteleri
travesti video
travesti sex
travesti porno
travesti
travesti
travesti
travestiler
travesti
travestiler
sohbet
travesti
chat
organik
güncel blog
sohbet
turkce mirc
sesli chat
okey
travesti

[pandora jewellery]

Interesting perspective on India ... thanks!