Globalisation poses many puzzles for the making of monetary policy, but until quite recently few central bankers had given it much thought (aside from the effect of Chinese goods deflation). Just under a year ago though Dallas Fed president Richard Fisher gave a speech at Harvard University on Globalization and Monetary Policy. In it he argued that in an globalising world, the usefulness of measures such as the (domestic) output gaps and Phillips curve was in question:
How can economists quantify with such precision what the U.S. can produce with existing labor and capital when we don’t know the full extent of the global labor pool we can access? Or the totality of the financial and intellectual capital that can be drawn on to produce what we produce?
As long as we are able to hold back the devil of protectionism and keep open international capital markets and remain an open economy, how can we calculate an “output gap” without knowing the present capacity of, say, the Chinese and Indian economies?
How can we fashion a Phillips curve without imputing the behavioral patterns of foreign labor pools? How can we formulate a regression analysis to capture what competition from all these new sources does to incentivize American management?
Until we are able to do so, we can only surmise what globalization does to the gearing of the U.S. economy, and we must continue driving monetary policy by qualitative assessment as we work to perfect our quantitative tool kit. At least that is my view.
The speech, one of the first to broach the subject, was overlooked by most - but not all. Earlier this year Janet Henry at HSBC produced a report on measuring the global output gap, and the implications for US inflation. Fisher returned the favour today, visiting London to speak at an HSBC seminar on Monetary Policymaking in a Globalized World. Fisher restated the case for looking beyond national borders:
In U.S. monetary policymaking circles, we work with cost calculations, assumptions about production functions and formulae for policy optimization that were developed before the world economic map was redrawn by the entry of new players and new technologies that changed our “ways of doing things.”
Consequently, the majority of the economic indicators we use to develop monetary policy today only look within our own borders. We measure domestic wages and incomes, domestic capacity utilization, domestic prices and domestic industrial activity. Where we do look beyond our border, we focus narrowly on foreign activity’s impact on our economy through trade and current account balances and relative currency values.
What about global wages, global capacity utilization and global industrial activity? What about the reconfiguration of assignments and tasks within businesses that take place in cyberspace, enabled by the Internet and intranet? I submit that these nondomestic activities and trends are growing more important to our economic welfare and that they condition how we develop and frame monetary policy.
Fisher made a plea for better data and analytical tools. He singled purchasing power parity (PPP) out for criticism, dubbing it "one of my pet peeves":
The raw material for PPP calculations is gathered under the guidance of the International Comparison Program, or ICP, which is coordinated by the World Bank and the OECD. Upon close examination, the ICP’s price comparisons appear to be fraught with errors. The problems seem to stem from the minuscule amount of resources devoted to gathering raw data. The rich countries of the EU, for example, devote something like one staff member per annum to gathering data for the ICP, a grossly deficient manpower commitment when you consider how many staff years go into the construction of national consumer price indexes and other metrics.
One can only imagine how shoddy the situation is in less developed countries. Until statistical agencies like the ICP develop accurate measurements of purchasing-power-adjusted output, this oft-quoted measurement device will be of limited utility for policymakers and might even lead to false conclusions.
In many emerging economies, the data needed to measure output gaps "simply don't exist". He gave other examples too:
For example, despite the boom in fixed-asset investment under way in China, there are no official estimates of its capital stock, which is a basic component in measuring an output gap. Data that might serve as a substitute, such as capacity utilization or unemployment figures, are spotty at best, released erratically and difficult to interpret.
As to the implications for the FOMC? Fisher concluded on this note:
My point is simply that the committee’s wisdom would be enhanced, and the economy would benefit, from having analytical tools to help us build more practicable models than what we currently have to guide our thinking as we make monetary policy in a complicated, reconfigured, globalized world. Today I appeal to you and your firms to help us develop these analytical tools either directly or by demanding them in the marketplace, where you wield considerable influence.
"How can we formulate a regression analysis to capture what competition from all these new sources does to incentivize American management?"
A better question might be "Why should we?".
Trying to use empirical economic data to forecast individual and not collective behaviour is dangerous. There are simply too many components involved, themselves the product of other forecasts, to make any such prevision believable.
It never ceases to amaze ... the presumption of some to forecast the behaviour of others. As if the "others" were all "rational" individuals behaving rationally.
Emotion, intuition, risk-taking ... they too have their effect on human behaviour. But, are they predictable?
Posted by: Lafayette | Tuesday, October 17, 2006 at 12:07 PM
Individuals are generally rational. What may seem irrational is due to differences in information. A person with less information than another may seem to make irrational choices to the person with more information. Conversely, a person with more information than another may seem to make irrational choices to the person with less information. Nonetheless, their choices are rational, although perceived as irrational. Economists typically use aggregate data, which is the sum of individual data. Of course, a large general equilibrium model, e.g. to understand a large economy, is beyond the capabilities of people (which takes place in hundreds of dimensions). Nonetheless, economists will tie-together various models to achieve a crude understanding.
Posted by: Arthur Eckart | Wednesday, October 18, 2006 at 12:15 AM
I guess an analogy for that would be the 'Euro-dollar' which provides the same monetary unit to all of Europe. Imagine all countries around the world sitting in on the inity of the United Nations.
Canada switched to metric in an effort to make dealing with other countries easier. Prior to the switch, it was difficult to deal with it was difficult. Now all the business done by Canada in a metric system would make trade so much easier.
Posted by: r4 card | Saturday, February 06, 2010 at 11:31 AM
xyy
This nike air max 2009 looks like a sneaker that a superhero
would wear. But these are for everyone, not only the superheroes. This latest Air Max 90 Current Moire comes in an eye popping colorway, as it features Black/Electric Green/Blue. Black is seen throughout the
href="http://shop.brandsuper.com/nike-air-max-shoes-c-54.html">nike air max shoes
including the upper. Blue is placed on the inner of the sneaker. The eyecatching Electric Green is used on the Nike Swoosh and the surrounding of the Air Max unit. The midsole and shoe laces both feature white. This Nike Air Max is a Hybrid, which
we can see a lot more of from Nike.
Black leather is seen throughout the shoe including on the mid panel and the mudguard. It can also be seen around the Air Max unit. Pine Green mesh is placed on the toe
box, tongue and the ankle. The midsole, Air Max 360, shoe
laces, inner lining and tongue tag are all done up in white. Not a huge nike
air max LTD.
Posted by: nike air max 2009 | Friday, April 16, 2010 at 03:30 AM
xyy
When her Monster Ball tour Chanel handbags online landed recently in Tokyo, La Gagita
href="http://www.youknowbags.com/chanel-handbags-c-14.html">Chanel handbag online
was seen in the airport carrying a white Hermes Birkin inscribed with amessage that loosely translates Chanel handbags sale to "I love little monster.
href="http://www.youknowbags.com">designer handbags sale
Toyko love."In case you're not familiar with the Gaga vernacular, "little monsters" is the namethat she uses to refer to her fans,handbag sale so her Birkin message was a shout-out to those that would be attending
her Japanese shows. Using accessories and the paparazzi to communicate-clever, or not so much?
Regular readers of the blog will authentic handbags know that I'm a huge Lady Gaga fangirl, so I think it's fairly
clever. It's not the most interesting thing she's ever done, designer handbags but playing with fashion and blurring
the lines of social acceptability are two things that are integral to her public image, and not only does a Sharpie’d Birkin combine those things effectively, but it has
managed set tongues replica handbags wagging all over the internet.
Posted by: Chanel handbags online | Friday, April 16, 2010 at 03:31 AM
xyy
cheap timberland boots have developed during 30years, now are widely distributed in 90 coutries all
world.timberland is excellent, there is no problem on shoes'design, quality, powerful and actual or fucntional aspects.timberland production include: clothing, etc.outdoor
casual footwear and geartimberland 6 inch .it urged the public to come out of their
sales outside of one of the world uggs nature.its timberland boots enjoy a full range of innovative
design, rugged, functional.their product also shows characters of young, active, rough , strong and practical.
And all they have an excellent durability first. timberland chukka boot are made of
strong leather, soft and hard in all areas of their rights. When you next time you see a discount cheap timberland roll top boots material force your hand, you see how solid it is. The second forest is not just insist that it is a chance to guide their
influence far exceeds the far-reaching. They try to take care of each person. In fact, there is a forest guide to the most appropriate activities. It is not only providing them
with timberland work boots. Woodland a quality line of outdoor clothing is that people want to see
people as good, but also requires a strong hiking clothes. Range is impressive. We have any kinds of timberland boots, you can choose your style.
Posted by: cheap timberland boots | Friday, April 16, 2010 at 03:41 AM
istanbul hotel new york hotels alaska This article is very beautiful, I really get very beyendım text files manually to your health as you travesti very beautiful and I wish you continued success with all respect ..
Thanks for helpful information travesti siteleri you catch up us with your sagol instructional çok explanation.
en iyi travestiler en guzel travesti
travesti
istanbul travestileri
ankara travestileri
izmir travestileri
travestiler
trv
travesti siteleri
travesti video
travesti sex
travesti porno
travesti
travesti
travesti
travestiler
travesti
travestiler
sohbet
travesti
chat
organik
güncel blog
sohbet
muhabbet
turkce mirc
Posted by: travesti sex | Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 01:20 PM
http://www.travestiservisi.com
Posted by: travesti | Friday, February 18, 2011 at 09:20 PM